Redundant wording in Java array and ArrayList declarations

A typical ArrayList declaration in Java has the following types:

ArrayList<Object> name = new ArrayList<Object>();

Similarly, for arrays, we have:

Object[] name = new Object[size];

Now, of course, we cannot declare the following types:

ArrayList<Object> name = new ArrayList<AnotherObject>();

Specifying the type and name of the same object twice always seems redundant to me Redundancy in the above statement can be easily accomplished by:

ArrayList<Object> name = new();

Is there any specific reason why I missed it? Why did it finish in its way?

Solution

This is not the case At least not anymore Now you can do this:

ArrayList<Object> name = new ArrayList<>();

You can't give up the second ArrayList because it doesn't have to match the first For example, you can do this:

List<Object> name = new ArrayList<>();

You'll get an ArrayList, but think of it as a list