Java – why does this type parameter remain in bytecode?
•
Java
Type erasure page says
However, for the following classes:
public class Foo<E extends CharSequence> { public E something; }
Javap - C foo print:
public class Foo<E extends java.lang.CharSequence> { public E something; }
Why is the type parameter not replaced by the binding (charsequence), but saved as e?
Solution
You are not printing bytecode This is the method signature It's there, so the compiler can enforce type safety when compiling other classes that call it
The content of this article comes from the network collection of netizens. It is used as a learning reference. The copyright belongs to the original author.
THE END
二维码